सामग्री पर जाएँ
सर्वकोश
वेदान्त पारिजात सौरभ (भगवद् निम्बार्काचार्य - द्वैताद्वैत वेदान्त ब्रह्मसूत्र भाष्य सटीक)

वेदान्त पारिजात सौरभ (भगवद् निम्बार्काचार्य - द्वैताद्वैत वेदान्त ब्रह्मसूत्र भाष्य सटीक)

Vedanta Parijata Saurabha of Nimbarkacharya with Commentary

भगवद् निम्बार्काचार्य (टीकाकार: श्रीश्रीनिवासचार्य - वेदान्तकौस्तुभ सहित) द्वारा

DevanagariHindipublished906 पृष्ठ

पृष्ठ 641, कुल 906 में से

संदर्भ में पढ़ें
पृष्ठ 641

[SŪ. 3. 3. 24.
620 VEDĀNTA-KAUSTUBHA ADH. 9.]
Om” (Tait. Ār. 10.63; ¹ Mahānār. 24.2), and having stated the fruit
belonging to a knower of Brahman, viz. the attainment of Brahman
thus: “He attains the greatness of Brahman” (Tait. Ār. 10 63, ²
Mahānār. 24 2), the text goes on to say: “For him who knows thus,
the soul of the sacrifice” (Tait. Ār. 10.64; Mahānār. 25 2) and so on.
As there is a reference to the knower of Brahman by the term ‘him’
here, and as it (viz. the meditation on the person) is mentioned in the
immediate vicinity (of the meditation on Brahman), so it is gathered
that the meditation on the person here is a subsidiary part of the
meditation on Brahman, and that (as such) the former has no reference
to a different fruit. This boing so, it is deduced that the attainment
of Brahman alone is the fruit of the meditation on the person which
is a subsidiary part of the meditation on Brahman. Hence it is
established that as the identity of mere names, viz. ‘meditation
on the person’ (puruṣa-vidyā), in the two cases, is of no great im-
portance, the vidyās are different; that being so, there is no combina-
tion of their special features.
Here ends the section entitled “The meditation on the
person” (9).
COMPARISON
Śaṁkara
He reads “Puruṣa-vidyāyām iva”, instead of “Puruṣa-vidyāyām
api”, and explains the sūtra thus: “As (the record of the Tāndins
and Paiṅgins is) in the puruṣa-vidyā, (not such is the record) of
others”. ³ Conclusion reached, the same.
Baladeva
This is sūtra 25 in his commentary. Like Śaṁkara he reads:
“iva” in place of “api”. He concludes here the topic of the worship
of the God-possessed souls, viz. that they, being not equal to the
Lord, are not to be meditated on as possessed of His attributes.
Hence the sūtra: (“As attributes like creatorship, rulership, and so
on, are declared to be belonging to the Lord) in the meditation on the
person (i.e. in the Puruṣa-sūktas of the Veda) and (in the Gopāla-
¹ Pp. 774-775. ² P. 775. ³ Ś.B. 3.3.24, p. 790.
10B