वेदान्त पारिजात सौरभ (भगवद् निम्बार्काचार्य - द्वैताद्वैत वेदान्त ब्रह्मसूत्र भाष्य सटीक)

614 VEDĀNTA-PĀRIJĀTA-SAURABHA [sū. 3. 3. 22.
ADH. 7.]
when walking, so exactly on account of the difference of the forms of
Brahman,—who is one indeed,—in consequence of His connection
with those respective places, (viz. the orb of the sun and the eye),
there is difference of vidyās, and as such no combination. Thus, in
one case, truth is to be meditated on as connected with the locality
of the sun, and here the name: "His secret name is 'Day'—this is in
reference to the presiding deities" (Bṛh. 5.5.3) is appropriate. The
insertion of such a name to the locality of the eye is not possible. In
the other case, on the other hand, it is to be meditated on as connected
with the locality of the eye, and here the name: ' His secret name is
'I'—this is in reference to the self" (Bṛh 5.5.4) is appropriate.
There can be no insertion of it to the locality of the sun In the
Śāṇḍilya-vidyā, on the contrary, there is no difference of place, since
the object to be meditated on is, in both the cases, situated within
the heart.
COMPARISON
Baladeva
This is sūtra 22 in his commentary. It answers the prima facie
view. He reads "aviśeṣāt" instead of "viśeṣāt". Hence the sūtra:
"Or not, (i.e. the God-possessed souls are not to be worshipped as
possessed of all God-like attributes,) on account of (their) non-difference
(from other souls)". That is, the God-possessed souls too are after
all jīvas and hence they are to be highly venerated, but not worshipped
like the Lord Himself ¹
SŪTRA 22
"AND (SCRIPTURE) SHOWS."
Vedānta-pārijāta-saurabha
The scriptural text, viz. "The form of this one is the very same
as the form of that one" (Chānd. 1 7.5 ²), "shows" the absence of
a combination of the attributes of that which is situated within the
sun and that which is situated within the eye.
¹ G.B. 3.3 22, p. 147, Chap. 3. ² Ś, R, Bh.