वेदान्त पारिजात सौरभ (भगवद् निम्बार्काचार्य - द्वैताद्वैत वेदान्त ब्रह्मसूत्र भाष्य सटीक)

An exact line-by-line transcription of the text on the page:

[SŪ. 3. 1. 16-17.
ADH. 3 ] VEDĀNTA-PĀRIJĀTA-SAURABHA 493
PRIMA FACIE VIEW (concluded)
SŪTRA 16
"ON ACCOUNT OF HIS ACTIVITY EVEN THERE, (THERE IS) NO
CONTRADICTION"
Vedānta-pārijāta-saurabha
"On account of the activity" of Yama alone even in the Raurava
and the rest, due to the fact that Citragupta and the like, the presiding
lords, are under the control of Yama,—to hold that there are other
lords too involves "no contradiction".
Vedānta-kaustubha
To the objection, viz Smṛti texts declare that in Raurava and the
rest there are other presiding lords like Citragupta and the rest.
Hence to say that all come under the sway of Yama seems to be
inconsistent,—(the prima facie objector) replies:
"On account of his activity," i.e. on account of Yama's activity",
"even there too", i.e. in Raurava and the rest too, Citragupta and the
rest are under the control of Yama; and hence there is "no
contradiction".
CORRECT CONCLUSION (Sūtras 17–20)
SŪTRA 17
"BUT (THE PATHS) OF KNOWLEDGE AND WORK THUS, ON ACCOUNT
OF BEING THE SUBJECTS OF DISCUSSION."
Vedānta-pārijāta-saurabha
Now the correct conclusion:
Scripture shows the non-descent of those who do not perform
sacrifices and the rest, under the knowledge of the five fires ¹ thus:
'Now through neither of these two paths these small many-times
returning creatures are born. "Be born and die",—thus is this third
place. Thereby this world is not filled up' (Chānd. 5.10.8 ²).
By the phrase: 'of the two paths', knowledge and work are
designated, these two "being the subjects under discussion". In the
¹ See pp. 809-10 of the book. ² Ś, R, Bh, ŚK, B.