वेदान्त पारिजात सौरभ (भगवद् निम्बार्काचार्य - द्वैताद्वैत वेदान्त ब्रह्मसूत्र भाष्य सटीक)

[SŪ. 2. 3. 37.
430 VEDĀNTA-PĀRIJĀTA-SAURABHA ADH. 10.]
COMPARISON
Śaṃkara
This is sūtra 37 in his commentary. Interpretation different,
viz. “As in the case of perception, there is non-restriction (with regard
to actions)”. That is, just as the soul, though free with regard to
perceptions, sometimes perceives what is good, and sometimes what
is bad, so the soul, though free to act, sometimes does what is good,
and sometimes what is bad.¹
Rāmānuja, Śrīkaṇṭha and Baladeva
This is sūtra 36 in the commentaries of the first two, but sūtra 35
in the commentary of the last. They interpret it as following. (If
prakṛti were the agent and not the individual soul, then there would
be) non-restriction (of actions) as in the case of perception”. That is,
just as it has been shown ² that if the soul be all-pervading no definite
perception will be possible, so if prakṛti be the agent, no definte activity
will be possible, since prakṛti being all-pervading and common to all,
all activities would produce results in the case of all souls, or produce
no results in the case of any one.³
SŪTRA 37
“ON ACCOUNT OF THE REVERSAL OF POWER.”
Vedānta-pārijāta-saurabha
If buddhi be the agent, then its instrumental power will cease,
and it must come to have the power of an agent. Hence the individual
soul is the agent.
Vedānta-kaustubha
To the objection, viz. in the text ‘Understanding performs a
sacrifice’ (Tait. 2.5), by the word ‘understanding’ buddhi alone is to
be understood, and it is the agent. Hence there instrumental case
has not been used ⁴—(the author) replies :
¹ Ś, B, 2.3.37, p. 625.
² Under Śrī. B. 2.3.32, Śk B. 2.3.32, G B. 2.3.30.
³ Śrī. B. 2.3.36, p. 153, Part 2; Śk. B 2.3.36, p. 153, Parts 7 and 8; G.B.
2.3.35, p. 208, Chap. 2.
⁴ Vide V.P S. 2.3.35 above.