सामग्री पर जाएँ
सर्वकोश
वेदान्त पारिजात सौरभ (भगवद् निम्बार्काचार्य - द्वैताद्वैत वेदान्त ब्रह्मसूत्र भाष्य सटीक)

वेदान्त पारिजात सौरभ (भगवद् निम्बार्काचार्य - द्वैताद्वैत वेदान्त ब्रह्मसूत्र भाष्य सटीक)

Vedanta Parijata Saurabha of Nimbarkacharya with Commentary

भगवद् निम्बार्काचार्य (टीकाकार: श्रीश्रीनिवासचार्य - वेदान्तकौस्तुभ सहित) द्वारा

DevanagariHindipublished906 पृष्ठ

पृष्ठ 442, कुल 906 में से

संदर्भ में पढ़ें
पृष्ठ 442

[SŪ. 2. 3. 29.
422 VEDĀNTA-PĀRIJĀTA-SAURABHA ADH. 9.]
form. Here he follows Śaṃkara, and points out that just as the all-
pervading Brahman is said to be atomic in reference to His abode,
viz. the heart, so the all-pervading soul is said to be atomic through
its attributes of passion and the rest.¹
SŪTRA 29
"ALSO BECAUSE OF LASTING AS LONG AS THE SOUL DOES, THERE
IS NO FAULT, BECAUSE IT IS SEEN."
Vedānta-pārijāta-saurabha
The designation of the soul's all-pervasiveness, due to its attri-
bute, is not inconsistent. "Also because of" the attribute lasting as
long as the soul does, there is no fault, because it is seen";² i.e.
because it is found in the passage: "‘For there is no cessation of the
knowledge of the knower, because of his imperishability. Imperish-
able, indeed. O! is this soul’" (Bṛh. 4 3 30 ³).
Vedānta-kaustubha
To the objection, viz. The attribute of the soul being sometimes
present and sometimes not, its all-pervasiveness due thereto vanishes,
and as such the designation of its all-pervasiveness is open to objections
—(the author) replies:
The term "also" is meant for disposing of the objection. The
soul is indeed eternal. As its attribute too "lasts as long as the soul
does", i.e. is an eternal attribute accompanying the soul, so the
designation of the soul's all-pervasiveness is not open to objections,
because we find that there are texts designating the attribute as lasting
as long as the soul does, such as: "‘For there is no cessation of the
knowledge of the knower, because of his imperishability. Imperish-
able, verily, O! is this soul’" (Bṛh. 4.3.30).


¹ Bh. B. 2.3.29, p. 137.
² C.S.S. ed., p. 440, omits the whole sentence which is but a repetition of the
sūtra itself. The other edition retains it.
³ Not quoted by others.