वेदान्त पारिजात सौरभ (भगवद् निम्बार्काचार्य - द्वैताद्वैत वेदान्त ब्रह्मसूत्र भाष्य सटीक)
Vedanta Parijata Saurabha of Nimbarkacharya with Commentary
भगवद् निम्बार्काचार्य (टीकाकार: श्रीश्रीनिवासचार्य - वेदान्तकौस्तुभ सहित) द्वारा
पृष्ठ 434, कुल 906 में से
संदर्भ में पढ़ें414 VEDĀNTA-PĀRIJĀTA-SAURABHA [SŪ. 2. 3. 20-21.
ADH. 9.]
COMPARISON
Śaṃkara
He takes sūtras 19–27 as laying down the prima facie view.
Literal interpretation same.
SŪTRA 20
“AND (THERE IS POSSIBILITY) OF THE SUBSEQUENT TWO (VIZ.
GOING AND RETURNING) THROUGH ONE’S SELF.”
Vedānta-pārijāta-saurabha
Sometimes departing may be possible on the part of even one
who is not moving, as in the case of the cessation of the rulership of a
village ¹ But, since there is possibility “of the subsequent two
through one’s self” alone, the individual soul is atomic.
Vedānta-kaustubha
As in the case of the cessation of the rulership of a village,
departing, which consists in the cessation of the rulership of the body,
may sometimes be possible on the part of the soul even when it is
not moving. But, since there can be the accomplishment “of the
subsequent two”, viz. going and returning”, “through one’s self”
alone, it is established that the individual soul is atomic.
SŪTRA 21
“IF IT BE OBJECTED THAT (THE SOUL IS) NOT ATOMIC, BECAUSE
OF THE SCRIPTURAL MENTION OF WHAT IS NOT THAT, (WE REPLY :)
NO, ON ACCOUNT OF THE TOPIC BEING SOMETHING ELSE.”
Vedānta-pārijāta-saurabha
If it be objected : In accordance with the text, referring to the
individual soul and designating “what is not that”, viz. : ‘He, verily,
is the great’ (Bṛh. 4.4.22 ²), the individual soul is “not atomic”,—
¹ I.e. when somebody ceases to be the ruler of a village, he may be said to
‘go out’.
² Ś, R, Bh, Śk, B.