वेदान्त पारिजात सौरभ (भगवद् निम्बार्काचार्य - द्वैताद्वैत वेदान्त ब्रह्मसूत्र भाष्य सटीक)

[SŪ. 1. 1. 1.
ADH. 1.] VEDĀNTA-KAUSTUBHA 17
lotus, on Brahman, supreme and adorable, free by nature from all
faults, and one mass of infinite auspicious qualities, and having the
vyūhas ¹ as His limbs' (D Ś 4).
The mutual differences among these (three) substances, viz the
sentient, the non-sentient and Brahman are taught by the texts
contained respectively in the different chapters (treating of these
three) and indicating the respective peculiarities of their qualities
and nature. The non-difference of the sentient and the non-sentient
is taught in the following texts — '"Existent alone, my dear, was
this in the beginning, one only, without a second"' (Chānd. 6.2.1),
'The self, verily, was this in the beginning, one only' (Ait. 1.1.1),
'Thou art that' (Chānd. 6.8.7; 6.9.8; 6.10.3; 6.11.3, 6.12.31;
6.13.3; 6.14.3; 6.15.3, 6.16.3), 'This soul is Brahman' (Bṛh. 4.4.5),
'All this, verily, is Brahman' (Chānd. 3.14.1), 'I am you, verily,
O reverend Deity', 'Then he knows the self alone "I am Brahman"'.
In this way, the two kinds of texts being both authoritative in
their primary and literal import, the sentient and the non-sentient,
though of different natures (from Brahman), yet are non-different
from Brahman, because they have their existence and activity under
His control,—just as the sense-organs, though of different natures
(from the vital-breath) are yet non-different from the vital-breath,
because they are under its control, as is well-known from the dialogue
between the vital-breath and the sense-organs in the Chāndogya:
'Verily, they are not called speech, eyes, or mind, but called the vital-
breath alone' (Chānd. 5.1.15). Hence the view of the author of the
aphorisms is that Brahman, the object to be enquired into, is both
different and non-different from the sentient and the non-sentient.
For that very reason, there is no necessity for enquiring into the two
realities (viz. the sentient and the non-sentient), and the doctrine that
through the knowledge of one, there is the knowledge of all ² fits in
well. As has been said: 'Hence, all knowledge concerning all objects
is true, since they, as declared by Scripture and Smṛti, have Brahman

¹ The vyūhas are Vāsudeva, Saṁkarṣaṇa, Pradyumna and Aniruddha.
Vide V.R.M., pp. 47–49, for details.
² Vide Chānd 6.1 ff The sense is that the sūtras recommend an enquiry
into Brahman alone, and not into the sentient and the non-sentient, not because
these two are unreal, but simply because by enquiring into Brahman, the Cause.
we come to know of the sentient and the non-sentient too, the effects, and
hence no separate enquiry is necessary.
2