सामग्री पर जाएँ
सर्वकोश
वेदान्त पारिजात सौरभ (भगवद् निम्बार्काचार्य - द्वैताद्वैत वेदान्त ब्रह्मसूत्र भाष्य सटीक)

वेदान्त पारिजात सौरभ (भगवद् निम्बार्काचार्य - द्वैताद्वैत वेदान्त ब्रह्मसूत्र भाष्य सटीक)

Vedanta Parijata Saurabha of Nimbarkacharya with Commentary

भगवद् निम्बार्काचार्य (टीकाकार: श्रीश्रीनिवासचार्य - वेदान्तकौस्तुभ सहित) द्वारा

DevanagariHindipublished906 पृष्ठ

पृष्ठ 352, कुल 906 में से

संदर्भ में पढ़ें
पृष्ठ 352

332 VEDĀNTA-KAUSTUBHA [SŪ. 2. 2. 6
ADH. 1.]
and the rest, eaten by cows, etc. become milk by themselves, so the
unmanifest, too, is transformed into the form of mahat and the rest.
Vedānta-kaustubha
If it be objected Just as grass, water, etc. are transformed into
the form of milk, so the unmanifest is transformed into the form of
mahat and the rest, independently indeed of another efficient cause,
—the author replies: “No”. This cannot be said Why? “On ac-
count of the non-existence elsewhere,” i.e. because “elsewhere”, or
in the case of oxen and the rest, other than that of cows, etc. there
is no transformation of the grass, water and so on, eaten by them,
into the form of milk The particle “and” implies that since the
transformation of the grass, etc , eaten by cows, into the form of milk
is admitted to be due to an intelligent principle, likewise pradhāna, too,
is transformed into the form of mahat and the rest as superintended
by an intelligent principle alone, and not by itself.
COMPARISON
Rāmānuja and Śrīkaṇṭha
They change the order of the sūtras 5–9 which will be noticed at
the end of sūtra 9. Interpretation same
SŪTRA 6
“EVEN IF THERE BE THE ADMISSION (OF ACTIVITY ON THE PART
OF PRADHĀNA, STILL THEN IT CANNOT BE THE CAUSE), ON ACCOUNT
OF THE ABSENCE OF A PURPOSE.”
Vedānta-pārijāta-saurabha
“Even if there be the admission” of activity on the part of
pradhāna somehow or other, still pradhāna cannot be the cause,
since a purpose for such an activity is impossible on its part, it
being non-sentient.
Vedānta-kaustubha
It has been said under the aphorism: “And on account of acti-
vity” (Br. Sū. 2 2.2) that pradhāna has no power of independent
activity, and hence is not the cause of the world. Now the author