वेदान्त पारिजात सौरभ (भगवद् निम्बार्काचार्य - द्वैताद्वैत वेदान्त ब्रह्मसूत्र भाष्य सटीक)

[SŪ. 2. 1. 6-7.
278 VEDĀNTA-PĀRIJĀTA-SAURABHA ADH 3 ]
CORRECT CONCLUSION (Sutras 6-7)
SŪTRA 6
“ BUT (IT) IS SEEN.”
Vedānta-pārijāta-saurabha
With regard to it, we reply: “It is seen” that there is the origin
of hairs on the head and so on from a person from whom they are
different, and of dung-beetles from the cow-dung from which they are
different. Hence it is not to be said that the universe, because of
being different from Brahman, has not Him as its material cause.
Vedānta-kaustubha
The author points out that such a prima facie view is based on a
fallacious reason (viz. ‘on account of difference’).
The word “but” is for disposing of the prima facie view The
statement that this universe has not Brahman as its material cause
on account of being different from Him, is not tenable, since it “is
seen” that there is the origin of nails, body-hairs and the rest from a
person from whom they are different, and that of the dung-beetles
from the cow-dung, from which they are different,—on account of
this,—this is the sense.
COMPARISON
Baladeva
Interpretation same, but he takes this sūtra as forming an
adhikaraṇa by itself.
—————
(CORRECT CONCLUSION (end))
SŪTRA 7
“ IF IT BE OBJECTED THAT (IN THAT CASE THE EFFECT MUST BE)
NON-EXISTENT (WE REPLY :) NO, ON ACCOUNT OF THERE BEING A
NEGATION MERELY ”
Vedānta-pārijāta-saurabha
If it be objected: If the effect be different from its material cause,
it must be “non-existent” prior to its origination,—(we reply.) No
such objection can be raised, “on account of there being a negation