वेदान्त पारिजात सौरभ (भगवद् निम्बार्काचार्य - द्वैताद्वैत वेदान्त ब्रह्मसूत्र भाष्य सटीक)

[sū. 1. 4. 23.
ADH. 7.] VEDĀNTA-KAUSTUBHA 257
COMPARISON
Śaṁkara, Bhāskara and Śrīkaṇṭha
Here too, as before, the general import is the same, but while
Nimbārka ¹ takes this adhikarana to be connected more directly with
the refutation of the Sāṁkhya doctrine, Śaṁkara, Bhāskara and Śrī-
kaṇṭha do not. Further, Śaṁkara and Bhāskara interpret the word
‘avasthiteḥ’ differently. To them, it means ‘because of (Brah-
man’s) abiding as the individual soul’ (vijñātmā-bhāvena) ².
Adhikaraṇa 7. The section entitled ‘The
material cause’. (Sūtras 23–27)
SŪTRA 23
“(BRAHMAN IS) THE MATERIAL CAUSE, AND (THE EFFICIENT CAUSE),
ON ACCOUNT OF THE ABSENCE OF CONFLICT WITH REGARD TO THE
INITIAL PROPOSITION AND THE ILLUSTRATION.”
Vedānta-pārijāta-saurabha
“The material cause,” as well as the efficient cause,—indicated by
the particle “and” (in the sūtra),—is none but the Supreme Soul,
because then alone the initial proposition: ‘“Did you ask for that in-
struction whereby the unheard becomes heard, the unthought becomes
thought, the unknown becomes known ?”’ (Chānd. 6.1.3 ³), as well as
the illustration: ‘“Just as, my dear, through a lump of clay, all objects
made of clay may be known”’ (Chānd. 6.1.4 ⁴) are explicable.
Vedānta-kaustubha
Having thus refuted the atheistic school of the Sāṁkhyas, now
the author, by refuting the theistic school of the Sāṁkhyas, is confirm-
ing the view, mentioned above, that the Lord is the non-different
material and efficient cause of the world.
It may be objected that, properly, this section ought to have
been inserted immediately after the aphorism: ‘From whom (arise)

---

¹ Vide V.K. 1.4.11, p. 137, Kāsī ed.
² Ś.B. 1 4 21, p. 426; Bh. B. 1.4.21, p 81.
³ Ś, R, Bh, ŚK, B. ⁴ Op. cit.
17