वेदान्त पारिजात सौरभ (भगवद् निम्बार्काचार्य - द्वैताद्वैत वेदान्त ब्रह्मसूत्र भाष्य सटीक)
Vedanta Parijata Saurabha of Nimbarkacharya with Commentary
भगवद् निम्बार्काचार्य (टीकाकार: श्रीश्रीनिवासचार्य - वेदान्तकौस्तुभ सहित) द्वारा
पृष्ठ 259, कुल 906 में से
संदर्भ में पढ़ें[sū. 1. 4 15.
ADH. 4.] VEDĀNTA-PĀRIJĀTA-SAURABHA 239
to (the order of the things created, like) the ether and the rest, (there
is no conflict among them with regard to the creator,) because as
(Brahman) is designated as the cause (in one Vedānta) so (He) is
mentioned (in other Vedāntas too)¹
Śrīkaṇṭha
Interpretation different. He does not begin a new adhikaraṇa
here, but continues the same topic Hence the sūtra: ‘And just as
on account of the declaration (i e understanding) (of Brahman) as
the cause (in all the Vedānta texts) with regard to (all the effects like)
the ether and the rest, (as well as in all other general texts), (pradhāna
of the Sāṁkhyas is not understood, so the Sāṁkhya principles are not
understood here)’. That is, just as we interpret the vague and general
text ‘verily, at that time, it was unmanifest’ (Bṛh. 1 4.7) in the light
of the specific text ‘The soul alone was this in the beginning’ (Bṛh.
1 4 1), and understand thereby the first text as denoting Brahman
and not the Sāṁkhya unmanifest or pradhāna, so exactly, here we
should interpret the vague and general text about the ‘five five-people’
(Bṛh 4.4.17, etc.) in the light of the specific passage about the vital-
breath and the rest (Bṛh. 4 4 18, etc.), and understand, thereby, the
‘five five-people’ as the vital-breath and the rest, and not as the
Sāṁkhya principles.²
SŪTRA 15
“ON ACCOUNT OF THE DRAWING IN.”
Vedānta-pārijāta-saurabha
“On account of the drawing in” of Brahman. That is, the very
same Brahman, mentioned previously in the passage: ‘He wished’
(Tait. 2.6 ³), is referred to in the passage: ‘The non-existent, verily’
(Tait. 2 7 ⁴) too. Similarly the very same Brahman, mentioned pre-
viously in the passage: ‘The sun is Brahman’ (Chānd. 3.19.1 ⁵), is also
referred to in the passage ‘The non-existent alone was this’ (Chānd.
3 19 1 ⁶). Hence, Brahman alone, who is ever existent, is denoted
¹ Ś.B 1.4.14, p. 414. ² ŚK. B. 1.1.14, p. 530, Part 6.
³ Ś, R, Bh, ŚK, B. ⁴ Op cit.
⁵ Not quoted by others. ⁶ Ś, R, Bh, B.