वेदान्त पारिजात सौरभ (भगवद् निम्बार्काचार्य - द्वैताद्वैत वेदान्त ब्रह्मसूत्र भाष्य सटीक)

[sū. 1. 3. 32.
ADH. 8.] VEDĀNTA-PĀRIJĀTA-SAURABHA 191
doubt arises, viz. Whether or not the gods are entitled to the medi-
tations on the honey and the rest. What is reasonable here? Gods
like the sun, Vasu and others have "no right" to the meditation on
the "honey and the rest",—so the teacher "Jaimini" thinks. Why?
"On account of impossibility," i.e. because it is impossible that the
sun and the rest which are accepted as the objects to be worshipped
in those meditations, can be themselves worshippers
OPPONENT'S VIEW (concluded)
SŪTRA 32
"AND BECAUSE OF (THEIR) BEING (WORSHIPPERS) WITH REGARD
TO THE LIGHT (I E. BRAHMAN)"
Vedānta-pārijāta-saurabha
"And because of (their) being" worshippers "with regard to"
Brahman, they are not entitled to the honey-meditation and the rest,—
this is the prima facie view.
Vedānta-kaustubha
But it is not to be thought that this being the case the gods are
without a Lord, because then they, being all of a mutually equal
status, will come to be annihilated through vying with one another,
and also because the text: 'Through fear the sun arises' (Tait. 2.8.1)
will come to be contradicted. The fact is that they are the worshippers
of the Highest Self and are themselves worshipped by others. So,
the opponent points out here. The gods and the rest, who are the
objects to be worshipped in the honey-meditation and the like, being
worshippers "with regard to the light", i.e. of the Supreme Brahman,
are not to be taken as the worshippers in the honey-meditation, etc.—
this is the sense; as declared by the passage: 'That the gods worship
as the Light of lights, as life, as immortal' (Bṛh. 4.4.16).
COMPARISON
Śaṁkara and Bhāskara
Interpretation of the word 'jyotiṣi' different The sūtra means,
according to them: And because (the words 'sun', 'moon', and the