सामग्री पर जाएँ
सर्वकोश
वेदान्त पारिजात सौरभ (भगवद् निम्बार्काचार्य - द्वैताद्वैत वेदान्त ब्रह्मसूत्र भाष्य सटीक)

वेदान्त पारिजात सौरभ (भगवद् निम्बार्काचार्य - द्वैताद्वैत वेदान्त ब्रह्मसूत्र भाष्य सटीक)

Vedanta Parijata Saurabha of Nimbarkacharya with Commentary

भगवद् निम्बार्काचार्य (टीकाकार: श्रीश्रीनिवासचार्य - वेदान्तकौस्तुभ सहित) द्वारा

DevanagariHindipublished906 पृष्ठ

पृष्ठ 167, कुल 906 में से

संदर्भ में पढ़ें
पृष्ठ 167

[sū. 1. 3. 4. 147
ADH. 1.] VEDĀNTA-PĀRIJĀTA-SAURABHA
inferrible pradhāna. On the contrary, there are texts denoting a
sentient being, such as, ‘He who is omniscient’ (Muṇḍ 1.1.9., 2 2.7)
and so on.
COMPARISON
Rāmānuja and Śrīkaṇṭha
Reading different, viz. take this sūtra and the next as one sūtra.¹
―――――
SŪTRA 4
“AND THE BEARER OF THE VITAL-BREATH.”
Vedānta-pārijāta-saurabha
“The bearer of the vital-breath” also is not the support of the
heaven, the earth and the rest Why? On account of the very same
absence of texts to that effect.
Vedānta-kaustubha
The words: ‘not, on account of the absence of texts to that
effect’ are to be supplied from the preceding aphorism. “The bearer
of the vital-breath”, i.e the individual soul, too, is not the support
of the heaven, the earth and the rest, on account of the absence of
texts to that effect;—that means: although the term ‘soul’ is equally
applicable to the individual soul and the Supreme Soul, yet just as
in this section, there are texts like ‘Him alone know as one —He is
the bridge to immortality’ (Muṇḍ 2.2 5), ‘He whois omniscient’ (Muṇḍ.
1.1.9; 2.2.7) and so on, establishing the peculiar qualities of the Supreme
Soul, so there are no texts here, establishing the peculiar qualities
of the individual soul;—also because it is impossible for the individual
soul, which is atomic by nature, to be the support of the heaven,
the earth and the rest. This aphorism is taken separately, because
of its association with the following aphorisms.²
―――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――
¹ Śrī B. 1.3.3, p. 283, Part 1.
ŚK. B. 1.3.3, p. 403, Part 4.
² That is, it would not have been necessary to introduce a special sūtra
for the individual soul,—which like pradhāna is precluded in the preceding sūtra,
—if it were not for the reasons given in the following three sūtras, which apply
only to the individual soul, and not to pradhāna.