वेदान्त पारिजात सौरभ (भगवद् निम्बार्काचार्य - द्वैताद्वैत वेदान्त ब्रह्मसूत्र भाष्य सटीक)
Vedanta Parijata Saurabha of Nimbarkacharya with Commentary
भगवद् निम्बार्काचार्य (टीकाकार: श्रीश्रीनिवासचार्य - वेदान्तकौस्तुभ सहित) द्वारा
पृष्ठ 109, कुल 906 में से
संदर्भ में पढ़ें[SŪ. 1. 1. 32.
ADH 11.] VEDĀNTA-KAUSTUBHA 89
COMPARISON
Śaṃkara
This is sūtra 31 in his commentary. Reading same. He gives
two alternative explanations of the second part of the sūtra, viz. the
reply to the objection, thus.—
(1) ‘If it be objected . . . , (then, we reply:)—On
account of the threefoldness of meditation, (i.e. your interpretation
would involve the assumption of devout meditation of three kinds,
viz. on the individual soul, on the chief vital-breath and on Brahman,
but one and the same section cannot teach three different kinds of
things). (Moreover, the word “vital-breath” must denote Brahman
here,) on account of (that meaning) being accepted (elsewhere), on
account of connection here (i.e in the passage itself characteristic
marks of Brahman are mentioned). (Hence the conclusion is that
Brahman is the topic of the whole chapter.)’ This interpretation is
different from Nimbārka’s interpretation.
Or, ‘If it be objected . . . , (then, we reply:) (the charac-
teristic marks of the individual soul and the chief vital-breath are not
out of place in a chapter which deals with Brahman) on account of
the threefoldness of meditation (i e. because this chapter aims simply
at advocating thereby the three ways of meditating on Brahman, viz.
under the aspect of the prāṇa, under the aspect of prajñā, and in
itself, according as Brahman is viewed either with reference to the
two limiting adjuncts, or in itself); because (in other passages also we
find that meditation on Brahman is) made dependant (on Brahman
being qualified by limiting adjuncts—cf. Chānd. 3.14 2); because
(the hypothesis that Brahman is meditated on under three aspects)
is perfectly consistent here (i e. in the prāṇa chapter ¹). This inter-
pretation too does not tally with Nimbārka’s interpretation, for
Nimbārka does not hold that the sentient and the non-sentient—
under the aspects of which Brahman is meditated on—are limiting
adjuncts of Brahman.-
Rāmānuja
Reading and interpretation same. According to Rāmānuja, the
three kinds of meditation are:— (1) Meditation on Brahman in His
own nature as the cause of the world, (2) meditation on Brahman as
―――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――
1 Ś B. 1.1 31, pp 255 ff.