वैयाकरण सिद्धान्त कौमुदी (भट्टोजि दीक्षित - बालमनोरमा व तत्त्वबोधिनी टीका सम्पूर्ण पूर्वार्ध)

:
"आत्ममाने किम्? दर्शनीयां स्त्रियं मन्यते दर्शनीयमानी चैत्रः। अत्र हि स्त्रिया दर्शनीयत्वं न तु चैत्रस्य।"
Here the commentary might say: "अस्वार्थस्योदाहरणं निर्दिशति" or "अस्वात्मार्थस्य"?
Wait, let's look at the letters in L13 very closely:
Is it:
अ - रु - ण ? No.
अ - न्व - र्थ - स्य ?
Wait! "अन्वर्थस्य"?!
Let's look:
अ + न्व + र्थ + स्य = अन्वर्थस्योदाहरणं !
Wait! Does "अन्वर्थस्य" fit the letters?
Letter 1: 'अ'
Letter 2: 'न्व'?
In 'न्व', there is 'न' and 'व'.
Wait, does it have an 'ा' stroke?
Look: after the letter, there is a vertical line. But wait, in 'न्व', there is no vertical line unless it's 'न्वा'? No, 'न्व' itself has a vertical stem for 'व'!
Wait, is there an aa-matra? No, the vertical line IS the stem of the consonant!
Wait, but does "दर्शनीयमानी चैत्रः" exemplify an "अन्वर्थ"? No, it's a pratyudaharana!
Wait, could it be "अयुक्तार्थस्य"?
Wait, what about "अमुष्य