वैयाकरण सिद्धान्त कौमुदी (भट्टोजि दीक्षित - बालमनोरमा व तत्त्वबोधिनी टीका सम्पूर्ण पूर्वार्ध)

क्षाः ॥ स्त्रियां नान्तलक्षणे ङीपि भत्वाट्टिलोपः । सुपथी । सुमती । नगरी ।"
Wait:

• "एवं मन्थाः ।"
• "ऋभुक्षाः ॥" -> wait, does it have '४' footnote marker?
  Let's look between ऋभुक्षाः and ॥:
  It says "ऋभुक्षाः ॥" - wait, where was footnote 4?
  Look at footnote 4: "४ अत्रैव दीर्घकारविधानेन..."
  Is marker 4 at "ऋभुक्षाः"?
  Wait, look at L7:
  "एवं मन्थाः । ऋभुक्षाः ॥"
  Wait, is there a small '४' above or near "ऋभुक्षाः"?
  Yes, there's a small digit 4 near ऋभुक्षाः, or maybe not visible clearly, but the footnote is 4.
  Wait, let's look at "सुपथी । सुमती । नगरी ।":
  Wait! Is it "सुमती" or "सुमथी"?
  मथिन् -> सुमथिन् -> feminine with ङीप् -> भत्वात् टिलोपः -> सुमथी!
  Yes! It is "सुमथी"! Not सुमती!
  Look at the letter: म (ma) + थी (thii) = सुमथी!
  "सुपथी । सुमथी । नगरी ।" - wait, is it "नगरी"?
  Wait, pathin, mathin, rib