ताण्ड्य महाब्राह्मण / पञ्चविंश ब्राह्मण (सायण भाष्य एवं चिन्नस्वामी शास्त्री टीका सहित)

? No, it's ङ्!
Wait, why would there be a mark above it?
Could it be that the typesetter accidentally put a repha? Like in "र्बर्हिर्णिध-" where they put rephas everywhere?
Look at "र्बर्हिर्णिध-": repha on ब, repha on हि, repha on णि! THREE rephas in one word!
The typesetter of this page had a loose repha or loved rephas!
In L11, on दिङ्निधनं, did they put a repha too?
Wait, look at: "र्दिङ्निधनं" or "दिर्ङ्निधनं" or "दिङ्निधनं"?
Wait, look at the mark above: it looks like a repha or an accent.
Wait, let's look at L24:
"क्षुल्लकवैष्टम्भंमंहावैष्टम्भं" -> look at "मंहावैष्टम्भं"! There is an anusvara on मं! A clear typo in this edition!
Look at L28:
"ईन्द्रा दूम्नायना १ इषा इत्यादि ।" -> "ईन्द्रा दूम्नायना" has a long ई and long दू!
Look at L29:
"इह कारणिधनेनाऽभ्यस्तं" -> "इह कार" with a space, "कारणिधनेनाऽभ्यस्तं" instead of "इहकारेणाभ