भारतीय इतिहास के ६ स्वर्णिम पृष्ठ (वीर सावरकर - विदेशी आक्रान्ताओं पर विजय गाथा)

The demand for a Hindu Raj, these pseudo-nationalists say, is communal,
stupid, mediaeval, theocratical, a menace to the progress of mankind itself!
But they conveniently refuse to tell us what they precisely mean by Hindu
Raj, before they characterise it in the above-mentioned vilifying terms.
Nevertheless, assuming for the sake of argument that the demand for a
Hindu State deserves this condemnation on all these counts, may we ask
them, was not the demand for a Moslem State at least equally condemnable
on these very counts? Did the Moslems not base their claim to own the
Pakistani Provinces on the ground that the Moslems constituted the major
community predominating there? How then that communal claim was
respected by you as so fundamentally national as to vivisect our Motherland
to make room for an Independent Moslem State? Why did you not refuse to
listen to that ‘Communal‘ claim as ‘stupid’? Did the Direct Action the
Moslems resorted to, not prove it to the hilt that the Moslem State they
demanded was avowedly theoretical, setting the hands of the clock of
Human Progress back not only to the ‘Mediaeval’ but to the beastial age?
But instead of fighting against that demand for a Moslem Raj, you actually
abetted the crime of cutting integrated India right into two pieces directly
on communal lines, which the Anglo-Moslem conspirators perpetrated and
handed over Pakistan to the Moslems so ceremoniously, with such ease and
grace as you would hand over a cup of tea to a welcome guest! With what
face now can you vilify the demand for a Hindu Raj on these very counts,
even if it could be said to possess all the above traits?
Perverse Gandhism
Had not Gandhiji himself conspired with the Ali Brothers to invite an
invasion by the Pathans and to enthrone the Amir of Afghanistan as the
Emperor of India? Had he not declared again in the year 1940 in writing
and repeated it now and then that if the Nizam, subduing the Hindu Princes
and with the support of Frontier tribes, took Delhi and became the ruler of
India that would be a perfect Home rule, a cent per cent Swaraj? Thus, a
Pathani or a Nizami Moslem Raj is to Gandhiji a cent per cent Swaraj. But
a Hindu Raj! Oh no! It would be communal, fascist, anti-national and an
anathema!!!
You contend further on that our country and our state can not be called
Hindusthan and a Hindu State as some non-Hindu minorities too are
citizens thereof. But how is it that in spite of the presence of Hindus,
Christians, Parsees and other non-Moslem minorities in its territory, all of