भारतीय इतिहास के ६ स्वर्णिम पृष्ठ (वीर सावरकर - विदेशी आक्रान्ताओं पर विजय गाथा)
Six Glorious Epochs of Indian History by Veer Savarkar
स्वातंत्र्यवीर विनायक दामोदर सावरकर द्वारा
पृष्ठ 478, कुल 494 में से
संदर्भ में पढ़ेंProblems before Hindudom After Bloodless (!)
Vivisection
RETALIATION
The vital interests of Hindudom demand that some maxims and arguments
emphasized in chorus by the Congressite Ministers, leaders and the press
should be promptly refuted. For example, Pandit Nehru has been reiterating,
of late, that the right of retaliation or punishment belongs to the state alone
and in no case, the people (meaning in this case Hindu-Sikhs) could be
justified in exercising it on their own initiation and responsibility. In laying
down this maxim, Panditji has happily refused to indulge in the
mischievous mumbo-jumbo of Gandhistic morals. He stated clearly that he
was not talking about the morals of this question but the practical aspects of
it only. So far so good. But he conveniently forgot to touch the most crucial
and practical aspect of the question—what were the people to do, when the
state proved either so unwilling or so pusillanimous as to fail miserably
even to defend its own people, not to speak of retaliating to avenge the
wrongs perpetrated on their hearths and homes and honour?
Even an individual has a legal right of self-protection and of retaliation in
so far, at any rate, as it forms an inevitable weapon of self-defence against a
violent aggressor, when the police is nowhere in evidence or is unable, or
the worst of it all, is unwilling to face the aggressor for fear of displeasing
him. Verily a people must have this fundamental right that every citizen
possesses.
What were the thousands of Hindu-Sikhs to do when faced by an
imminent danger of being massacred in cold blood, looted, ‘burnt alive,’
forcibly converted, in short, of being exterminated as a racial and national
being by the most barbarous attacks of an organised, dangerously armed
and fanatically hostile foe, and especially when the state as such was
nowhere in evidence so efficiently as to render any the least protection to
them? While the state of Pakistan allowed firearms and explosive to be
distributed to the Moslem population throughout Western Punjab, the
League leaders were openly inciting their people that Pakistan was but a
springboard to pounce upon Hindusthan and the Moslems in their thousands
were parading in the streets, in towns and in cities, dangerously armed and
raising terror-striking slogans ‘Haske liya Pakistan, marke lenge
Hindusthan.’ While the Moslem state was planning in this wise definite