सिद्धान्तशिरोमणि: गोलाध्याय (भास्कराचार्य - मरीचि भाष्य एवं पं. केदारदत्त जोशी सविस्तार व्याख्या)

ार्धान्तरश्च"?
Wait, let's check: "तत्त्वार्धान्तरश्च" is much more standard, but looking at the type:
Wait, could it be "तत्त्वार्धान्तराच्च"? No, it's clearly रश्च.
Let's write "तत्त्वार्धान्तिरश्च" or "तत्त्वार्धान्तरश्च". Wait, let's look at "उन्नतलवसंगुणोकृतं" vs "संगुणीकृतं":
Look at the top of ण: it really has that mark. But wait, in line 13:
उन्नतलवसंगुणीकृतं - wait, let's look at 'ी' in 'प्रोक्ताः' vs 'नाड्यः' vs 'स्थूलाः':
Wait, in 'प्रोक्ताः', the ो is clearly a kana + matra.
In 'संगुणीकृतं', look at the kana! Is there a kana after ण?
Wait, look at the word:
उ - न्न - त - ल - व - सं - गु - ण - ो - कृ - तं
Wait! Look between ण and कृ!
Is that a kana with an e-matra (making ो)?
YES! There is a full vertical line with a matra pointing left, and before it is the ण!
Wait, why does it have an 'ो'?
Because the typesetter mistook the manuscript's 'ी' for 'ो'!
In many manuscripts