सामग्री पर जाएँ
सर्वकोश
सिद्धान्तशिरोमणि: गणिताध्याय (भास्कराचार्य - ग्रहगणित, मध्यमाधिकार व स्पष्टाधिकार सटीक)

सिद्धान्तशिरोमणि: गणिताध्याय (भास्कराचार्य - ग्रहगणित, मध्यमाधिकार व स्पष्टाधिकार सटीक)

Siddhanta Shiromani Ganitadhyaya of Bhaskaracharya with Commentary

भास्कराचार्य द्वितीय द्वारा

DevanagariHindipublished573 पृष्ठ

पृष्ठ 160, कुल 573 में से

संदर्भ में पढ़ें
पृष्ठ 160

140
= Śaṅku, √(R² — Śaṅku²) = Drig-jyā. In all the cases
cited above, the radins R happens to be the hypotenuse.
Comm. The convention in verse 19 corresponds to
saying in modern trigonometry that sin 90 + θ = cos θ
sin (180 — θ) sin θ, sin 180 + θ = — sin θ, sin 270 — θ
= — cos θ sin 270 + θ = — cos θ, sin 360 — θ = — sin θ.
In Hindu trigonometry the sign is understood and not
explicitly mentioned.
Krāntijyā, Dyujyā, Drig-jyā and Śaṅku, are respecti-
vely H sin δ, H cos δ, H sin Z, H cos Z where δ is decli-
nation and Z the Zenith-distance of a celestial body.
Taking the radius of the celertial equator to be R, the
radius of the diurnal circle of a celestial would be equal
to R × cos δ = H cos δ which is called Dyujyā because it
is the radius of the diurnal circle.
Verse 22. The lengths of the circumferences of the
Manda—epicycles are respectively 13° — 40', 31° — 36',
70°, 38°, 33°, 50,* for the Sun, Moon, Mars, Mercury,
Jupiter, Venus and Saturn.
Comm. Bhāskara has given these measures reportedly
on the basis of Āgama or ancient authority. The peculiarity
of measuring the circumferences in degrees less than 360°,
is due to the idea that these circumstances are measured in
relation to that of the deferent or Kakshā Vritta taken to be
360°. In other words, circumference of the epicycle of a
planet as given above : circumference of the mean orbit ::
x : 360 = radius of the epicycle : radius of the mean orbit
where x is the measure of the circumference of the planet-
ary epicycle. It may be mentioned once again that the
radius of a planetary epicycle is the measure of the greatest

  • The printed book of Brahma Sphuta Siddhānta gives in the case of
    Saturn 30° only which might have been the mistake of the scribe (Vide
    verse 36, Spashtadhikāra B. S.). In the place of शून्यरामाः it ought to
    have been शून्यबाणाः.