रत्नावली नाटिका (सम्राट हर्षवर्धन - शास्त्रीय नाटिका रत्न सम्पूर्ण ४ अङ्क सान्वय सटीक)

!
Wait, what is before क्ष?
Is it प? विपक्षः?
Why would it say: "verb विपक्षः"?
Wait! Could "verb" NOT be the English word "verb"?
Wait, look at the letters:
v e r b?
Yes, 'v', 'e', 'r', 'b'! It is clearly "verb".
Then why would it be followed by something meaning "is intended" or "is elided"?
Wait! "verb विवक्षितः"? But there are only three letters!
Wait, could it be:
"verb विवक्षः"? No, Kale was an English/Sanskrit scholar, he wouldn't write ungrammatical "verb विवक्षः".
Wait, could it be a misprint in the book?
Look at line 18: "मनोरमः;" instead of "मनोरमायाम्" or "मनोरमायां"! The book definitely has typos (it's a 19th/early 20th century Indian print).
Wait, could it be "verb विवक्षा"?
Look at the end: is it a visarga ः or ा?
Wait, look at the two dots:
Are there two dots?
Look at:
वि [glyph] [glyph]
Wait, is the first letter after 'verb