पाटीगणित (श्रीधराचार्य - प्राचीन संस्कृत टीका एवं प्रो. कृपाशंकर शुक्ल सविस्तार व्याख्या)
Patiganita of Sridharacharya with Commentary
श्रीधराचार्य (सम्पादक: प्रो. कृपाशंकर शुक्ल) द्वारा
पृष्ठ 46, कुल 337 में से
संदर्भ में पढ़ेंxxxiv INTRODUCTION
The first interpolation is the entire commentary to Ex. 70,
at the end of which the interpolator says :
एष च द्वितीयोदाहरणश्लोकष्टीकाकृता स्वटीकायां न व्याख्यातः।
i.e., "This verse of the second example was not explained
by the commentator in his ṭîkâ."¹
The second interpolation comprises lines 19-23 on page
119, the third lines 17-20 on page 120, and the fourth lines
11 16 on page 123. In regard to these three interpolations, the
interpolator makes the following general remark on p. 123 :
अस्य चतुर्थोदाहरणस्य 'आदिः पदहृतगणितमि'त्यतः प्रभृत्युदाहरणेषु टीकाकृता
त्रयाणामुदाहरणानामाद्याद्यानयनप्रकारे दर्शिते भूय आद्याद्यानयनप्रकारो न दर्शित इति
वृत्तिग्रन्थे मूलग्रन्थे चास्योदाहरणस्य दृष्टत्वादस्माभिर्लेखनावसर एव तदानयनप्रकारो दर्शित
इत्यलम् ।
i.e., "The commentator (ṭîkâkâra) having explained the me-
thod of finding the first term etc. in relation to the first three
examples given after the rule 'âdiḥ padahṛtagaṇitam', etc., has
not explained the method of finding the first term, etc., again
in relation to the fourth example. But, this fourth example be-
ing available in 'the book containing the text' as well as in
'the book containing the commentary,' we have ourselves
explained that method while making this copy."
The fifth interpolation occurs on p. 167 and comprises
the lines occurring after the following remark of the interpo-
lator :
यथा चात्र पृथक् खण्डत्रयात् क्षेत्रफलानयनं तथा चाग्रिमोदाहरणे टीकाकृदेव
प्रकटयिष्यतीत्यलम् ।
i.e., "Just as here the area is (being) obtained by deform-
ing the whole figure into three parts, so in the next example
the commentator himself will explain."
5. SRIDHARACARYA. Having thus briefly noticed
the Pâṭîgaṇita and the present commentary on it, let us now say
something regarding Śrîdharâcârya, the author of the Pâṭîgaṇita
The personal history of this author is shrowded with great obs-
curity. The author mentions his name in the opening stanza