पानीपत १७६१ (मराठा साम्राज्य एवं पानीपत महायुद्ध इतिहास)
Panipat 1761 with Historical Commentary
टी. एस. शेजवलकर / शास्त्रीय अनुवाद द्वारा
पृष्ठ 8, कुल 197 में से
संदर्भ में पढ़ेंrisk than to be an agent in circulating palpable falsehoods. Those who have
a liking for such stuff can have recourse to the original chronicles which should
go as literary pieces, but not as history. They can be turned to sociological
uses too.
The study of this subject I began a decade ago and many causes have
retarded its progress. I had an intention of first stating the theory of the
Maratha State in an independent monograph and then of writing this volume
for the correct understanding of which it is absolutely necessary. Now I am
stating the same in bare outline in the Introduction. Then again for various
reasons, mainly but not exclusively personal, the work was written in parts and
then held over. This fact has adversely affected its merit as a literary product.
Had the work been written out in the first glamour of the subject and in the
Panipat locality, it would definitely have been a more unitary piece of
work. But the loss on the presentation side has been made up by gain
on the thinking side. The battle could not have been satisfactorily described
by me four years ago, when I could not visualise it properly. After
that, the coming in of new material and even the hope of getting access to
valuable material held over my design. Such rare material has been made
available to me by the kindness of co-workers in the field of history, especially
through the assiduity of Mr. G. H. KHARE of the Bharat Itihas Samshodhak
Mandal. The thanks of all students of history would naturally go to him, in
addition to those of mine. Other scholars who have helped me in furthering
my project are Dr. G. S. GHURYE of the University School of Sociology in
Bombay; Rao Bahadur K. N. DIKSHIT, the retired Director-General of Archæ-
ology, who acted as a host to me in my northern tour; the authorities of the
B. I. S. Mandal, Poona; and many others too numerous to be individually
mentioned. The readers' thanks should also go to Dr. S. M. KATRE, Di-
rector of our Institute, for the drive he has shown in pushing the work through
and for its general and artistic get-up, and to the Press for their excellent
workmanship.
21st March, 1946.
T. S. S.