पानीपत १७६१ (मराठा साम्राज्य एवं पानीपत महायुद्ध इतिहास)

40 PANIPAT. 1761
the Peshwa had miscalculated the forces and had attempted a wrong solution
of the problems?
From Sironj, Bhau proceeded towards Gwalior via Arun,⁴² Malan,⁴³
Pohari and Kaledhar,⁴⁴ arriving there on the 30th of May, 1760 He took
stock of the Maratha forces and tried to strengthen them in every possible way
But his efforts were wasted on men whom he wished to propitiate The fault
was not Sadashivrao's but of the times By the middle of the 18th century,
the dissolution of the Mughal Empire was practically complete and what an
English historian has called "The Great Anarchy" began This anarchy which
lasted almost for a century, ended finally after the great mutiny of 1857 The
various fragments of the Mughal Empire, great and small, powerful and weak,
had entered into a general scramble for power and pelf, and none was think-
ing in terms of principles, nor was anyone in a mood to think of Indian unity
Only the Peshwa was thinking in terms of the whole of India ruled from one
centre and following a common policy But Sadashivrao Bhau's appeal fell
on deaf ears and hence produced no result All the previous sins of commission
and omission by the three Peshwas raised their heads as ghosts from their
graves Everybody who had once been helped by the Marathas forgot all
moral obligation to show gratitude or at least sympathy, while all who had any
sense of having been badly treated sit on the fence in expectancy of the Mara-
thas receiving a good drubbing at the hands of the Durrani king The con-
sciousness of having all the surrounding people against the Marathas must have
had a demoralising influence on the Maratha army Great battles are never
won by despondent soldiers!
The Marathi Chronicles of Sadashivrao Bhau report that Bhau had
sought the opinion of Malharrao Holkar and Janakoji Shinde, and they had
advised Bhau not to come personally, but to send armies for their help on the
strength of which they would defeat Abdali Their opinion was based on the
idea that the prestige of a nation is lowered when the chief himself is obliged
to enter the arena of the battle, because it is thought as a sort of comment on
the (in)capacity of his subordinates and if by chance or through ill luck the
chief is defeated, it becomes difficult for the army to hold out afterwards On
the other hand, the authors of the chronicles report the discussions in the privy
council of Sadashivrao Bhau Therein Bhau's supporters, like Balvantrao
Mehendale, saw more than was obvious in the advice of Holkar and Shinde "
"Because these sardars and mamlatdars in the north had up till then lived in
perfect freedom without feeling the pressure of the chief's control, and feared
that their misdeeds would be revealed in the presence of a strict man like
Sadashivrao Bhau, they are advising Bhau not to advance any farther," they
thought When Bhau proceeded in spite of these remonstrances, the veteran
Malharrao Holkar was reported to have let loose his tongue in wild rage at his
advice being brushed aside with scant respect, and abused the advisers of Bhau
He wrote again that Bhau should at least stop at Gwalior and not cross the
⁴² Raj 1 186
⁴³ Ibid 1 188
⁴⁴ Khare 1.22