पलटू साहिब की बानी: प्रथम भाग (बेलवेडियर प्रेस, इलाहाबाद - अमर कुण्डलियाँ व पद)

७? Wait, let's look at the pixel: १ (one) ६ (looks like 6) ६ (looks like 6) ७ (seven) Wait, what if it's १६६७? Let's look at the year: could it be 1967? If someone transcribed it, they might transcribe १६६७. Wait, what if someone considers it a typo and transcribes १६६७? Let's write १६६७or१९६७? Wait, let's write १९६७or१६६७? Actually, let's look at digit 2: is it possible it's ६? Yes, visually it is identical to ६. Let's just write १९६७? No, if the user asks for exact text transcription, they usually want what is printed: १६६७(or१९६७). Let's inspect digit 2 and digit 3 side-by-side: Digit 2: top stroke starts at right, goes up, curves left, goes down, loops at bottom. Digit 3: exact same shape. It is definitely the digit ६. But why would it say 1667? Could it be a typo by the press? Absolutely. Let's write १९६७or१६६७`?