वेदों की प्राचीनता एवं काल-निर्णय / ओरायन (लोकमान्य बाल गंगाधर तिलक - खगोलीय वैदिक शोध)

92 THE ARCTIC HOME IN THE VEDAS.
what he understands by the expression, “a number of mornings
which were aforetime at the sun’s uprising.”
The case , is, therefore, reduced to this. The word ahan,
of which ahâni (days) is a plural form, can be ordinarily interpre-
ted to mean (1) a period of time between sunrise and sunset; (2) a
nycthemeron, as when we speak of 360 days of the year; or (3) a
measure of time to mark a period of 24 hours, irrespective of
the fact whether the sun is above or below the horizon, as when
we speak of the long Arctic night of 30 days. Are we then to
abandon all these meanings, and understand ahâni to mean ‘splen-
dours’ in the verse under consideration? The only difficulty is to
account for the interval of many, days between the appearance
of the banner of the Dawn on the horizon and the emergence of
the sun’s orb over it; and this difficulty vanishes if the description
be taken to refer to the dawn in the Polar or Circum-Polar
regions. That is the real key to the meaning of this and similar
other passages, which will be noted hereafter; and in its absence
a number of artificial devices have been made use of to make these
passages somehow intelligible to us. But now nothing of the kind
is necessary. As regards the word ‘days’ it has been observed
that we often speak ‘a night of several days,’ or ‘a night of several
months ’ when describing the Polar phenomena. In expressions like
these the word ‘day’ or ‘month’ simply denotes a measure of time
equivalent to ‘twenty-four hours,’ or ‘thirty days;’ and there is
nothing unusual in the exclamation of the Ṛig-Vedic poet that
“many were the days between the first beams of the dawn and
actual sunrise.” We have, also seen that, at the Pole, it is quite
possible to mark the periods of twenty-four hours by the rotations
of the celestial sphere or the circum-polar stars, and these
could be or rather must have been termed ‘days’ by the