मृगेन्द्र आगम: विद्या एवं योग पाद (भट्ट नारायणकण्ठ वृत्ति सहित प्राचीनतम कामिक आगम परिशिष्ट)

!
Wait, why does 'न्न' look weird?
In KSTS, printed at the "Tatva-Vivechaka Press, Bombay" or "Nirnaya Sagar Press":
In this typeface, the double 'न' (न्न) when followed by 'ना'... wait, is it 'न्न'?
Wait, in "श्रीमन्नारायण", it's 'न्' + 'न' + 'आ' = 'न्ना'!
Wait, does it have 'न्ना'?
Look: after 'म', there is:
Wait! Look at the glyph:
Is it 'न्न'?
Wait! Look at 'न्न' in 'इत्यस्मिन्नेव' (L4):
In L4: इ - त्य - स्मि - न्ने - व
Here 'न्' + 'ने' is written with half-na and full-na with e-matra.
In line 1, look at the glyph between 'म' and 'रा':
Wait! Is that glyph 'न्ना'?
Wait, if that glyph is 'न्ना', then what is the glyph after it?!
Let's read ALL glyphs in line 1:
1: श्री (śrī)
2: म (ma)
3: [glyph]
4: [glyph]
5: रा (rā)
6: य (ya)
7: ण (ṇa)
8: क (ka)
9: ण्ठ (ṇṭha)
10: वि (vi)