मेरा आजीवन कारावास / माझी जन्मठेप (स्वातंत्र्यवीर सावरकर - काले पानी का ऐतिहासिक संस्मरण)

whom you may have duped into embracing your faith. This is the rationale of the
Shuddhi movement which we have resolved to launch, and no specious argument can
divert us from our true path.
A Hindu thief is less harmful to Hindu culture than a Mohomedan thief. The
former will only rob, the latter will break the temple he has robbed, he will break the idol
in it and give a shattering blow on the head of a kaffir, while running away from the place
of robbery. He will spill his blood to save his soul in heaven. This difference between the
two has ever to be borne in mind by everyone as a probabilty. Hence persuading as we
must a thief to give his thieving, a drunkard to give up his drink, and a greedy wicked
man to give up his greed and wickedness, we must not give him up, as a Hindu, to any
other faith or religion than his own. It is the duty of every Hindu to persuade a Hindu to
remain a Hindu. It is a principle to be followed as vital to his community and culture for
the preservation and progress of both.
But there is another valid reason why the cult of Shuddhi must be propagated
throughout the Hindu society, and why, above all, our boys and girls, our young men and
women, must be persuaded to adopt it.
It is well if a Hindu thief gives up thieving, but even if he does not give it up, he
must be made to remain a Hindu. The theft is a sin no doubt, but to cease to be a Hindu is
a greater sin, and a social and national sin. Persuade a Hindu thief not to commit that sin.
Every one who calls himself a Hindu must impress it upon the most abandoned Hindu
that it is not well for him to change his religion. He must strive his hardest to do it. For
our ancestors committed the greatest blunder when they allowed such persons to go out
of their fold, in pride of self-sufficiency and moral superiority. "Let them go where they
choose", said they, "we are sufficient unto ourselves." "He is, after all, a wretched being,
let him be a Mohammedan, a Christian or whatever he will. It is nothing to us." And what
was the result? For one person whom they so neglected there arose, hundred years ago,
hundred Muslims and Christians to be born enemies of Hinduism, Hindu society and
Hindu culture. Aurangzeb was born to such an abandoned Rajput woman. The Moplas
of Malabar are by blood and bone half-Hindus. They have forgotten the mothers who
gave them birth, and today, they swear by their fathers and behave as bitter enemies of
the Hindus. Whence this difference in one generation or two? The difference has arisen
by their conversion to Islam, by "the childish play" of the Moulvi who cut their tuft of
hair and made them grow a beard.
The Childish play of great men
Thus even for its name the meanest man or the most useless man must be kept a
Hindu if he happens to be born a Hindu. We as Hindus have lost terribly for not playing
the game which others have played. It has affected us detrimentally, as we should come