काव्यप्रकाश (आचार्य मम्मट - सम्पूर्ण १० उल्लास सटीक)

160 KĀVYAPRAKĀŚA
कार्यत्वेनोक्तानीति नोपभोगे एव प्रतिबद्धानीत्यनैकान्तिकानि ।
व्यक्तिवादिना चाधमपदसहायानामेषां व्यञ्जकत्वमुक्तम् ।
न चात्राधमत्वं प्रमाणप्रतिपन्नमिति कथमनुमानम् । एवंविधा-
दर्थादेवंविधोर्थ उपपत्त्यनपेक्षत्वेपि प्रकाशते इति व्यक्तिवादिनः
पुनस्तत् अदूषणम् ॥
इति काव्यप्रकाशे ध्वनिगुणीभूतव्यङ्ग्यसंकीर्णभेदनिर्णयो
नाम पञ्चम उल्लासः ॥५॥
the verse itself they are described as brought about by
bathing ; so that they are not invariably concomitant with
the ‘ dalliance ’ (of the person addressed, which is held to
be suggested).
According to the upholder of the ‘ Suggestion ’ theory,
on the other hand, the said suggestion has been explained as
brought about by the marks described, through the aid
of the epithet ‘ wretched ’ (applied to the lover, which
suggests his infidelity in having dallied with the messen-
ger).—Nor could this ‘ wretchedness ’ be made the basis
of any Inference, for the simple reason that it is not some-
thing that is already cognised through any (other) valid
means of cognition. As for the fact that a certain set of
words gives rise to the notion of things (not actually
expressed by them), without any rhyme or reason,—this
cannot be effectively urged against the upholder of the
‘ Suggestion ’ theory (who takes pride in the suggestion
of such meanings). 47.
Thus ends Chapter V dealing with the sub-divisions
of Suggestive Poetry and the Poetry of Subordinate
Suggestion.