गुप्त अभिलेख संग्रह (जे. एफ. फ्लीट - गुप्त सम्राटों एवं परवर्ती नरेशों के ऐतिहासिक पाषाण व ताम्रलेख)

THE GUPTA INSCRIPTIONS; INDEX. 319
Junâgaḍh rock inscription of Skanda-
gupta, of the Gupta years 136, 137, 138, 56
Junâgaḍh State, inscriptions from the . 56, 164
Jupiter, the planet; its regent men-
tioned under the names of Aṅgiras,
170; — the son of Aṅgiras, 170; —
Bṛihaspati, ‘the lord of prayer,’ 170,
76, 86, 157; — Guru, ‘the preceptor,’
169, 170, 171 and n., — Ijya, ‘the
teacher,’ 170; — Jîva, ‘the living being,’
170; — Suraguru, ‘the preceptor of the
gods,’ 81, 90, 157; — Surêjya, ‘the
teacher of the gods,’ 173; — the coun-
sellor of (Indra) the lord of the gods
(dêvapatimantrin), 161; — the coun-
sellor of the gods (sura-mantrin),
161 n.; — and the preceptor of the
gods (sura-guru and tridaśa-guru)
157, 169, 181
Jupiter, the planet; exposition of the
Twelve-Year Cycle based on his heliacal
risings, with reference to his apparent
longitude, in particular nakshatras,
Appendix III., 161 to 176; — the
authorities for this system of the cycle,
with the rule for naming the years of
it, according to the order of the lunar
months, commencing with Kârttika,
161 and n., 170, 171; — the length of
each year of the cycle, by this system,
is roughly 400 days, 162; — a practical
illustration of two cycles of this system,
167; — the years of this cycle that are
liable to be omitted, and to be repeat-
ed, 168; — this is evidently the original
system of the Twelve-Year Cycle, 172;
— instances of the later and modern
use of it, 173 and n., 175; — the helia-
cal risings of Jupiter are still noted in
Pañchâṅgs, for religious purposes,
173 n.; — there are indications that the
Sixty-Year Cycle also was originally
regulated by the same system, 170 and
n., 173, 174; — the years of the Twelve-
Year Cycle, by this system, mentioned
in records of the Early Gupta period,
are, Mahâ-Âśvayuja, 110, 117, 104, 115;
— Mahâ-Chaitra, 114, 108; — Mahâ-
Mâgha, 119, 112; — and Mahâ-Vaiśâkha,
104, 96; — examination of the dates of
these records, 101, 104, 110, 114, 117,
119; — the Pausha and Vaiśâkha years
of a Twelve-Year Cycle are mentioned
in early Kadamba records (the absence
of the prefix mahâ possibly indicates
that they are of the mean-sign system),
106 n.; — the proof that the epoch of
the Gupta era was not determined by
the Twelve-Year Cycle according to
the heliacal-rising system . . . . 34, 35
Jupiter, the planet; incidental remarks
on the Twelve-Year Cycle based on his
passage, with reference to his mean
longitude, among the signs of the
zodiac, 162, 169, 170; — the rule, as
given by the first Âryabhaṭa and by
Brahmagupta, for determining the
years of this cycle by this system, 169;
— the years commence with the years
of the Sixty-Year Cycle by the same
system; and the length of each year,
according to the Sûrya-Siddhânta, is
361 days, 1 ghaṭî, 36 palas, 170; — (in-
stances of the use of the cycle, by this
system, indicated by the absence of
the prefix mahâ, are possibly to be
found in early Kadamba records,
106 n.); — the proof that this is not the
system of the cycle used in records of
the Early Gupta period, 103, 108, 111,
115, 118, 121; — and that the epoch of
the Gupta era was not determined by it 34, 35
Jupiter, the planet; incidental remarks
on the Sixty-Year Cycle based on his
passage, with reference to his mean
longitude, among the signs of the
zodiac, 102, 169, 170, — the rule of the
Sûrya-Siddhânta for determining the
years of this cycle by this system,
170; — the length of each year of this
cycle, by this system, according to the
same authority, is 361 days, 1 ghaṭî, 36
palas, 170; — a verse by Kaśyapa
seems to indicate that the years of this
cycle also were originally determined
by the heliacal-rising system, 170 and
n. ; — Varâhamihira gives the rule that
Prabhava, the first year of this cycle,
commences when Jupiter comes to
Dhanishṭhâ and rises in Mâgha, 173,
174; — comments on this rule, which is
not correct for the mean-sign system,
but is nearly so for the heliacal-rising
system, 173 n., 174; — the Sixty-Year
Cycle by the mean-sign system, was
current in Southern, as well as in North-
ern, India, at least up to A.D. 804, . .
80 n.; — the proof that the epoch of the
Gupta era was not determined by this
cycle . . . . . . . . 34
Jupiter, the planet; the use of the Sixty-
Year Cycle, according to the southern
luni-solar system, seems to have been
introduced between A.D. 804 and 866,
. . 80 n.; — and the epoch of the Gupta
era cannot have been determined by
this cycle . . . . . . 33, 34
Jyêshṭhaśarmârya, a grantee . . . 243
Jyôtishadarpaṇa, an astrological work;
its date is A.D. 1557-58, . . 175; — a
quotation from it in support of the
heliacal-rising system of the Twelve-
Year Cycle of Jupiter . . . . 170
ka, an affix from which certain modern
declensional suffixes are derived 69,
113, 117, 121, 125, 126, 130, 135, 197, 261
Kâbul, the Hindu kings of; remarks on
some of their coins, which have been
supposed to bear dates in the Gupta
era . . . . . . . . 57 to 60