गुप्त अभिलेख संग्रह (जे. एफ. फ्लीट - गुप्त सम्राटों एवं परवर्ती नरेशों के ऐतिहासिक पाषाण व ताम्रलेख)

THE GUPTA INSCRIPTIONS; INTRODUCTION. 129
Such an era is the Vikrama era.¹ And,—though the expired years of this era might
be quoted, as is shewn, for instance, by lines 19 and 21 of the Mandasôr inscription
of Mâlava-Saṁvat 529 expired, No. 18, page 79, and by line 21 of the Kaḍi grant of
Jayantasiṁha of Vikrama-Saṁvat 1280 expired,²—yet, that, occasionally at least, the
current years were used, is proved by the Gwâlior Sâsbahû temple inscription of Mahî-
pâla,³ in which we have first in words, the number of years expired, 1149, and then,
partially in words and fully in figures, the number of the current year, 1150. Such an era,
again, is the Gupta-Valabhî era; or, at least, we have not as yet obtained the slightest
indication of its ever having been used by astronomers as the basis of calculations.
And, in the absence of the use of any word meaning "expired" in connection with the
year in a Gupta-Valabhî date, it is only reasonable that we should follow the ordinary rules
of interpretation, and render the original passage as denoting a current year.
In one instance only, among the Gupta-Valabhî dates at present known, is a word
meaning "expired" used in connection with the year. This exceptional instance is the
Môrbî grant of Jâiṅka, in which an eclipse of the sun is recorded as having occurred when
the year 585 had passed by. Unfortunately, the month and tithi, in and on which the
eclipse occurred, are not specified; nor even the week-day. And, as we have seen at page
100 above, it might be possible to identify the solar eclipse of this record with that
of the 10th November, A.D. 904. In that case, the given year 585 expired, and the
indicated year 586 current, would be equivalent to A.D. 904-905 current. It would then
be as an expired year, not a current one, that the year 165 of the Êraṇ pillar inscription
of Budhagupta is equivalent to A.D. 484-85 current; and so on with all the other dates.
And we should have to apply, in the case of all dates in the era referable to the true
and original scheme of its years, the epoch of A.D. 318-19 current, or more precisely,
by the Śaka year, the period⁴ from the 18th February, A.D. 318, to the 8th March, A.D.
319; and, in the case of dates belonging to the same class with those of the Kaira
grant of the year 330 and the Verâwal inscription of Valabhî-Saṁvat 927, the epoch of A.D.
317-18 current, or more precisely, by the Vikrama year, the period from the 23rd Sep-
tember, A.D. 317, to the 11th October, A.D. 318. But we have also seen that the solar
eclipse in question can be far more satisfactorily identified with that which occurred
on the 7th May, A.D. 905; to do which, we have to take the given year 585 expired, and
the indicated year 586 current, as equivalent to A.D. 905-906 current. And this record,
therefore, furnishes strong and instructive corroboration of my view that, in the absence of

---

¹ The present Tables of this era, however, seem to be arranged, like those of the Śaka era,
according to expired years. And some of the almanacs quoted in Appendix I. below, give them in
the same way.
² Ind. Ant. Vol. VI. p. 197.
³ For the full reading and translation of the date see Texts and Translations, page 22, note 5.
⁴ Here, again, I owe the exact initial and ending dates to Mr. Sh. B. Dikshit.