गोविन्द भाष्य (श्रील बलदेव विद्याभूषण - अचिन्त्यभेदाभेद वेदान्त ब्रह्मसूत्र भाष्य सटीक)

saktāḥ karmaṇy avidvāṁso
yathā kurvanti bhārata
kuryād vidvāṁs tathāsaktaś
cikīrṣur loka-saṅgraham
"As the ignorant perform their duties with attachment to results, the learned
may similarly act, but without attachment, for the sake of leading people on the
right path."*
In the next sūtra Jaimini Muni gives a different opinion.
Sūtra 18
parāmarśaṁ jaiminir acodanā cāpavadati hi
parāmarśam—favorable idea; jaiminiḥ—Jaimini; acodanā—not ordering; ca—
and; apavadati—criticizes; hi—because.
Jaimini favors it. It is not ordered, and because indeed it is forbidden.
Purport by Śrīla Baladeva Vidyābhūṣaṇa
A person situated in transcendental knowledge has the freedom to perform
prescribed Vedic rituals and duties in whatever way he likes. That is the meaning
of the Śruti-śāstra's explanation that he may act as he likes.
The word "hi" here means "because". The word parāmarśam" means that the
Śruti-śāstra orders that even one situated in transcendental knowledge must
perform Vedic rituals, and the word "apavadati" means that the Śruti-śāstra forbids
that he stop performing Vedic rituals. The word “acodanā" means that a person
situated in transcendental knowledge may renounce those activities not prescribed
by the scriptures. That is the meaning here.
Īśopaniṣad mantra 2 and the passage from Taittirīya Brāhmaṇa (quoted in the
purport of sūtra 7) both forbid the renunciation of Vedic rituals. They do not say
that one should renounce Vedic rituals.
Therefore there is a contradiction, with some texts encouraging performance of
Vedic rituals and some encouraging renunciation of Vedic rituals. It is not that the
texts encouraging renunciation are wrong. These texts are intended for persons
who are crippled, mute, or in some other way unable to perform Vedic rituals.
Therefore even they who are situated in transcendental knowledge should
continue to perform Vedic rituals.