गोविन्द भाष्य (श्रील बलदेव विद्याभूषण - अचिन्त्यभेदाभेद वेदान्त ब्रह्मसूत्र भाष्य सटीक)

heyatva—worthy of being abandoned; vacanāt—because of the statement; ca—also.
(The Brahman described in the Vedic scriptures is not a manifestation of the
modes of material nature,) because no scriptural passage advises one to abandon
(Brahman in order to attain something higher).
Purport by Śrīla Baladeva Vidyābhūṣaṇa
If the Brahman described in the scriptures were enmeshed in the modes of
material nature, then why do the scriptures not direct men and women to abandon
the worship of Brahman and worship something higher? If this Brahman were
under the spell of the modes of nature, then why do those aspiring after liberation
worship this Brahman to become free from the grip of the modes of nature?
Clearly, the Brahman described in the scriptures is not entangled in the modes of
material nature, and for this reason the scripture state:
anyā vāco vimuñcātha
"Give up talking about things that have no relation to the Supreme Brahman!"
They who aspire for liberation should meditate with pure faith on this Supreme
Brahman, who is eternal, filled with all transcendental qualities, and the orginal
creator of the material universes. In this way it may be understood that the
Brahman described in the Vedic scriptures is not a product of the modes of
material nature.
Sūtra 9
svāpyāt
sva—into Himself; apyāt—because He merges.
(The Supreme Brahman described in the Vedic literatures is not bound by the
modes of nature,) because He merges into Himself, (unlike the creatures bound by
nature's modes, who all merge into something other than their self).