सामग्री पर जाएँ
सर्वकोश
गोविन्द भाष्य (श्रील बलदेव विद्याभूषण - अचिन्त्यभेदाभेद वेदान्त ब्रह्मसूत्र भाष्य सटीक)

गोविन्द भाष्य (श्रील बलदेव विद्याभूषण - अचिन्त्यभेदाभेद वेदान्त ब्रह्मसूत्र भाष्य सटीक)

Govinda Bhashya of Baladeva Vidyabhushana with Commentary

श्रील बलदेव विद्याभूषण (संपादक: कृष्णदास बाबा जी) द्वारा

DevanagariHindipublished647 पृष्ठ

पृष्ठ 364, कुल 647 में से

संदर्भ में पढ़ें
पृष्ठ 364

between the Lord and His attributes, even though there is in truth no distinction at
all. If this is not done then it would not be possible to speak sentences like,
"Existence exists," "Time is always," and "Space is everywhere," statements that
are useful in ordinary discourse. Nor are statements like “Existence exists" foolish
illusions. They are meaningful statements, as the sentence "The jar exists" is a
meaningful statement. These statements are not metaphors like the sentence
"Devadatta is a lion", for the statement “Existence does not exist" can never be
truthfully said. Nor do these statements hint that attributes do not exist, for in the
previously stated example of water flowing from a mountain peak there are
certainly attributes. However, the idea that the Supreme Lord is different from His
attributes is certainly denied here. In this way the Supreme Personality of Godhead
is not different from the attributes He possesses.
Adhikaraṇa 15
The Supreme Personality of Godhead Experiences the Highest Bliss
Introduction by Śrīla Baladeva Vidyābhūṣaṇa
Now will be described the truth that the bliss and other attributes of the Lord
are all of the highest nature. If the bliss and other attributes of the individual spirit
souls were equal to the bliss and attributes of the Lord, love and devotion for the
Lord would not be possible.
Viṣaya (the subject to be discussed): Now will be discussed the texts that
describe these attributes of the Lord.
Saṁśaya (doubt): Are the bliss and other attributes of the Supreme Lord greater
than the bliss and other attributes of the individual spirit souls, or are they not
greater than them?
Pūrvapakṣa (the opponent speaks): Because the bliss of the Supreme
Personality of Godhead is described in the same terms used to describe the
ordinary blisses of the material world, therefore the Lord's bliss is not greater.
After all, when one speaks the word "jar" one doesn't mean something greater than
a jar.
Siddhānta (conclusion): In the following words the author of the sūtras gives
His conclusion.