ब्राह्मस्फुटसिद्धान्त (ब्रह्मगुप्त - शून्य, कुट्टक, बीजगणित एवं सम्पूर्ण २१ अध्याय सान्वय सटीक)

NASIR ED-DIN AL TŪSI 33
of spiral motion, as it has been rather improperly called.¹ It
represented a retrograde step of exceedingly great magnitude,
totally unjustified as the theory could not seriously pretend to
be superior to the Ptolemaic system, which had only become so
very simple if one was content with representing only the princi-
pal phenomena. We are told by the Jewish astronomer Isaac
Israeli of Toledo, that the new system made a great sensation,
but that it was not sufficiently worked out to be taken seriously,
and that the system of Ptolemy, founded on the most rigorous
calculations, could not be superseded by it.² Another Jewish
author, Levi ben Gerson, in a work written in 1328, entered into
a lengthy refutation of the hypotheses of Al Betrugi.³ But the
latter certainly represented a general desire on the part of the
Spanish Aristoteleans to overcome the physical difficulties in
accepting the Ptolemaic system ; thus Averroes says that the
astronomy of Ptolemy is merely a convenient means of compu-
ting, and that he himself in his youth had hoped to prepare a
work on the subject.
Nasir ed-din Al Tūsi
While ineffectual attempts were being made in the far
west, to devise a new astronomical theory, the astronomers of
the east did not remain blind to the desirability of finding a
system, in which the planets were not supposed to move unsup-
ported in space in such a wonderfully complicated manner; and
in the thirteenth century we find one of the greatest astronomers,
Nasir ed-din Al Tūsi, advocating a system of spheres which he
supposed to be more acceptable than excentrics and epicycles.⁴
In addition to a review or digest of the Syntaxis of Ptolemy he
wrote a shorter work entitled Memorial of Astronomy, in various

1. e.g. by Riccioli, Almag. Nov. T. I. p. 504, where Kepler's figure of the real
   motion of Mars in space from 1580 to 1596 (supposing the earth to be at
   rest) is copied, as if that had anything to do with the "Spirals" of Alpetra-
   gius.
2. He adds that he was not qualified himself to sit in judgment on the pro-
   posed system (Liber Jesod Olam, II, 9, p. XI.)
3. Munk, Melanges pp. 500 and 521.
4. "Les spheres celestes selon Nasir-Eddin Al tūsi. Par M. Carra de Vaux."
   Appendix VI. to Tannery's Recherches sur l'astr. anc. pp. 337—360. In-
   cludes a translation of the chapter in which the new theory is set forth.