सामग्री पर जाएँ
सर्वकोश
ब्राह्मस्फुटसिद्धान्त (ब्रह्मगुप्त - शून्य, कुट्टक, बीजगणित एवं सम्पूर्ण २१ अध्याय सान्वय सटीक)

ब्राह्मस्फुटसिद्धान्त (ब्रह्मगुप्त - शून्य, कुट्टक, बीजगणित एवं सम्पूर्ण २१ अध्याय सान्वय सटीक)

Brahmasphuta Siddhanta of Brahmagupta with Commentary

आचार्य ब्रह्मगुप्त द्वारा

DevanagariHindipublished737 पृष्ठ

पृष्ठ 239, कुल 737 में से

संदर्भ में पढ़ें
पृष्ठ 239

ALGEBRA GOES TO EUROPE FROM INDIA 195
having been followed in the tract of emendation,
after a sufficient interval to make further correction
requisite, by Durgāsinha and Mihira; who were again
succeeded after a further interval by Brahmagupta, son
of Jiṣṇu.
In short, says Colebrooke, Āryabhaṭa was founder of
one of the sets of Indian astronomers, as Puliśa, an
author likewise anterior to both Varāhamihira and
Brahmagupta, was of another : which were distingui-
shed by names derived from the discriminative tenets
respecting the commencement of planetary motions at
sunrise according to the first, but at midnight accord-
ing to the latter, on the meridian of Laṅkā, at the
beginning of the great astronomical cycle. A third
sect began the astronomical day, as well as the great
period, at noon.
Āryabhaṭa’s name accompanied the intimation which
the Arab astronomers (under the Abbasside Khalifs, as
it would appear,) received, that three distinct astro-

  • nomical systems were current among the Hindus of
    those days : and it is but slightly corrupted, certainly
    not at all disguised, in the Arabic representation of
    it Arjabahar, or rather Arjabhar, (corrupted form of
    Āryabhaṭa). The two other systems were, first,
    Brahmagupta’s Siddhānta which was the one they
    became best acquainted with, and to which they apply
    the denomination of the sind-hind; and second, that of
    Arca, the Sun, which they write Arcand a corruption
    still prevalent in the vulgar Hindi.
    Āryabhaṭa appears to have had more correct notions
    of the true explanation of celestial phenomena than
    Brahmagupta himself, so says Colebrooke; who in a
    few instances, correcting errors of his predecessor, but
    oftener deviating from that predecessor’s juster views,
    has been followed by the herd of modern Hindu astro-
    nomers, in a system not improved, but deteriorated,
    since the time of the more ancient author.
    Considering the proficiency of Āryabhaṭa in astronomi-
    cal science, and adverting to the fact of his having