भारतीय इतिहास के ६ स्वर्णिम पृष्ठ (वीर सावरकर - विदेशी आक्रान्ताओं पर विजय गाथा)

remained a loyal servant of Mahapadmanand, that the India-wide revolution
that he successfully brought about, was not for the sake of freeing the
Indian land from the foreign Mlenchcha domination, but only to avenge his
personal insult! For this very reason, this anecdote is clearly perverted.
101. When as a strategy in politics, Shivaji went to Agra accepting the
overlordship of Aurangzeb, the latter insulted him, and when there was a
clash of words, Shivaji was put under arrest. But Shivaji slipped away most
miraculously and skilfully, and declared war against Aurangzeb. If, after
telling this story, any wiseacre were to conclude that it was because he was
personally insulted, that Shivaji bore a grudge against Aurangzeb and
established an independent kingdom for himself, that he had no higher
motive of the emancipation of his religion and country, it would be the
height of absurdity and foolishness. Equally absurd and foolish would it be
to say that it was only to avenge his personal insult by Emperor Nanda, that
Arya Chanakya brought about a political revolution by exterminating the
Nanda dynasty.
That Anecdote should be Explained thus
102. It is not true to say that because of his personal insult, Shivaji
revolted against Aurangzeb. On the contrary, Aurangzeb had taken a fright
that it was to overthrow his alien religious domination, that Shivaji had
taken arms, fired as he was with a glowing fervour for Hindutwa. That is
why, he insulted Shivaji and relegated him to captivity! In a similar way,
because Mahapadmanand had secret reports that, availing himself of the
weakness of the reigning monarch, Arya Chanakya was busy conspiring
against him so as to overthrow the Nanda empire, the Emperor Nanda
insulted him in his royal palace, and at that very moment, the illustrious
Brahmin Arya Chanakya retorted boldly, "If I am a true Chanakya I shall
see to it that your tyrannical rule is overthrown so that Bharat might
prosper." This is how the anecdote should be explained.
103. A very solid proof for this is available to us in the very Koutiliya
Arthashastra written by Chanakya himself. While introducing the writer, it
is said (in the very book):
चाणक्य इति विख्यातः श्रोत्रीयः सर्वधर्मविद्
—मुद्राराक्षस उपोद्घात Telang's edition p.44
येन शस्त्रं व शास्त्रं च नन्दराज गताच भूः ॥